Celeron J1900
VS
Atom D2700

Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2700

Intel

Celeron J1900

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.42 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Atom D2700

2 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1900 is positioned at rank 216 and the Atom D2700 is on rank 490, so the Celeron J1900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1900

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#204
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
382%
#205
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
376%
#206
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
346%
#207
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
344%
#208
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
341%
#210
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
329%
#211
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
316%
#212
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
315%
#213
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
307%
#216
Celeron J1900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D2700

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
99%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
97%
#478
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
639%
#479
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
630%
#480
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
578%
#481
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
575%
#482
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
570%
#484
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
551%
#485
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
528%
#486
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
527%
#487
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
513%
#490
Atom D2700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron J1900 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom D2700 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron J1900Atom D2700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J1900Atom D2700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1900 and Atom D2700

Intel

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

Intel

Atom D2700

The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

Processing Power

The Celeron J1900 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom D2700 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 versus 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 — a 179.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J1900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron J1900 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom D2700 uses Cedarview (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1900 scores 1,152 against the Atom D2700's 1,148 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J1900. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900 vs 0 kB on the Atom D2700.

FeatureCeleron J1900Atom D2700
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.42 GHz+1762%
0.13 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.13 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-D (2013)
Cedarview (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,152
1,148
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1900 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom D2700 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Celeron J1900 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J1900) vs 1 (Atom D2700). Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Bay Trail SoC (Celeron J1900) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700).

FeatureCeleron J1900Atom D2700
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Celeron J1900) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron J1900Atom D2700
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Intel GMA 3650