Celeron J1900 vs Xeon W3505

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1900 vs Xeon W3505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1900 vs Xeon W3505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1900

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 130W, a 128W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Xeon W3505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,152 vs 1,163).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).

Xeon W3505

2009

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌6400% higher power demand at 130W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1900 better than Xeon W3505?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3505 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron J1900 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1900 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J1900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J1900 vs Xeon W3505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1900 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3505 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 versus 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 — a 128.1% clock advantage for the Celeron J1900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron J1900 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3505 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1900 scores 1,152 against the Xeon W3505's 1,163 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W3505. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3505.

Feature	Celeron J1900	Xeon W3505
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.42 GHz+357%	0.53 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.53 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,152	1,163

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1900 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3505 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.