Celeron J1900 vs Pentium 977

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium 977 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium 977: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1900

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 17W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium 977 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 977

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,148 vs 1,152).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Celeron J1900 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌750% higher power demand at 17W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1900 better than Pentium 977?

Yes. Celeron J1900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.3% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J1900 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 72.9% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1900 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron J1900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% higher PassMark. Pentium 977 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium 977 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

Pentium 977

The Pentium 977 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1900 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 977 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium 977 — a 53.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J1900 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron J1900 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 977 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1900 scores 1,152 against the Pentium 977's 1,148 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J1900. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 977.

Feature	Celeron J1900	Pentium 977
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.42 GHz+73%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+43%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,152	1,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1900 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 977 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.