Celeron M 540
VS
Phenom II X4 900e

Celeron M 540 vs Phenom II X4 900e

Intel

Celeron M 540

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2007
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 540 is positioned at rank 873 and the Phenom II X4 900e is on rank 373, so the Phenom II X4 900e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 540

#861
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1447%
#862
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1426%
#863
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1309%
#864
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1303%
#865
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1291%
#867
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1247%
#868
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1195%
#869
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1193%
#870
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1161%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#883
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 900e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5415%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3715%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1119%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
886%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
775%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
444%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
399%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
399%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
395%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
384%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
379%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
377%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
374%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
100%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
98%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
97%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
97%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
96%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
96%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
95%
#373
Phenom II X4 900e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
97%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X4 900e leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron M 540 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron M 540Phenom II X4 900e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron M 540Phenom II X4 900e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 540 and Phenom II X4 900e

Intel

Celeron M 540

The Celeron M 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,744 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Phenom II X4 900e

The Phenom II X4 900e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 540 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom II X4 900e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 900e has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M 540 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 900e — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 900e. The Celeron M 540 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Phenom II X4 900e uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 540 scores 1,744 against the Phenom II X4 900e's 1,727 — a 1% lead for the Celeron M 540.

FeatureCeleron M 540Phenom II X4 900e
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
2.4 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,744
1,727
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron M 540) / not specified (Phenom II X4 900e). Direct competitor: Celeron M 540 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.

FeatureCeleron M 540Phenom II X4 900e
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false