
Celeron M 540 vs Xeon L5335

Celeron M 540

Xeon L5335
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 540 is positioned at rank 873 and the Xeon L5335 is on rank 995, so the Celeron M 540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 540
Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5335
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron M 540 | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($18) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron M 540 | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+11%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($18) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 540 and Xeon L5335

Celeron M 540
The Celeron M 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,744 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L5335
The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.
Processing Power
The Celeron M 540 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Xeon L5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M 540 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Xeon L5335. The Celeron M 540 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 540 scores 1,744 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 540.
| Feature | Celeron M 540 | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 4 / 4+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.86 GHz | 2 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,744 | 1,737 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Celeron M 540) / not specified (Xeon L5335). Direct competitor: Celeron M 540 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Celeron M 540 | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron M 540 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Xeon L5335 debuted at $380. At current prices ($20 vs $18), the Xeon L5335 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 540 delivers 87.2 pts/$ vs 96.5 pts/$ for the Xeon L5335 — making the Xeon L5335 the 10.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron M 540 | Xeon L5335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-77% | $380 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $18-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.2 | 96.5+11% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














