A10-5745M vs Celeron M 540

A10-5745M vs Celeron M 540 Performance Spectrum

A10-5745M

4 / 4

1,767

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 540

1 / 1

1,744

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5745M vs Celeron M 540 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5745M vs Celeron M 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5745M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8610G, while Celeron M 540 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.

Celeron M 540

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,744 vs 1,767).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while A10-5745M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5745M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5745M better than Celeron M 540?

Yes. A10-5745M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5745M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5745M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5745M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-5745M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 540 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (20.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5745M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5745M vs Celeron M 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5745M

The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron M 540

The Celeron M 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,744 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5745M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 540 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A10-5745M has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M 540 — a 43.7% clock advantage for the A10-5745M. The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 540 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Celeron M 540's 1,744 — a 1.3% lead for the A10-5745M.

Feature	A10-5745M	Celeron M 540
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+56%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,767+1%	1,744

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-5745M versus 667 on the Celeron M 540 — the A10-5745M supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5745M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 4 — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5745M) vs 0 (Celeron M 540) — the A10-5745M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5745M) and GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 540).

Feature	A10-5745M	Celeron M 540
Socket	FP2	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333+100%	667
Max RAM Capacity	16+300%	4
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5745M) vs false (Celeron M 540). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Celeron M 540 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U; Celeron M 540 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.