A10-5745M vs Athlon II P320

A10-5745M vs Athlon II P320 Performance Spectrum

A10-5745M

4 / 4

1,767

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II P320

2 / 2

1,776

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5745M vs Athlon II P320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5745M vs Athlon II P320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5745M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8610G, while Athlon II P320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,767 vs 1,776).
❌2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.

Athlon II P320

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while A10-5745M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5745M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II P320 better than A10-5745M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5745M is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II P320 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II P320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II P320 is the better buy right now. Athlon II P320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-5745M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5745M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5745M vs Athlon II P320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5745M

The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5745M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II P320 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5745M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 — a 32% clock advantage for the A10-5745M. The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II P320 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Athlon II P320's 1,776 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II P320.

Feature	A10-5745M	Athlon II P320
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,767	1,776
Geekbench 6 Single	—	189
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	308

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5745M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II P320 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-5745M versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II P320 — the A10-5745M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5745M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5745M) vs 0 (Athlon II P320) — the A10-5745M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5745M) and M880G (Athlon II P320).

Feature	A10-5745M	Athlon II P320
Socket	FP2	S1g4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-5745M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II P320). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Athlon II P320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U; Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.