A10-5745M vs Xeon L5408

A10-5745M vs Xeon L5408 Performance Spectrum

A10-5745M

4 / 4

1,767

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5408

4 / 4

1,769

+0.1%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5745M vs Xeon L5408 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5745M vs Xeon L5408: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5745M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 40W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8610G, while Xeon L5408 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,767 vs 1,769).

Xeon L5408

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 40W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5745M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5745M better than Xeon L5408?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5408 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-5745M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5408 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5745M still makes the most sense overall. A10-5745M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5745M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5745M vs Xeon L5408 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5745M

The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon L5408

The Xeon L5408 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.133 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,769 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-5745M and Xeon L5408 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon L5408 — a 182.8% clock advantage for the A10-5745M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.133 GHz). The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5408 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Xeon L5408's 1,769 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon L5408.

Feature	A10-5745M	Xeon L5408
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+2131%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.133 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB (total)+500%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,767	1,769

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5745M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5408 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5745M	Xeon L5408
Socket	FP2	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5745M) / not specified (Xeon L5408). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Xeon L5408 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U.