A10-5745M vs Core Duo T2600

A10-5745M vs Core Duo T2600 Performance Spectrum

A10-5745M

4 / 4

1,767

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2600

2 / 2

1,765

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5745M vs Core Duo T2600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5745M vs Core Duo T2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5745M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8610G, while Core Duo T2600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1150% higher power demand at 25W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2600

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,765 vs 1,767).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5745M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5745M better than Core Duo T2600?

Yes. A10-5745M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5745M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5745M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5745M still makes the most sense overall. A10-5745M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5745M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5745M vs Core Duo T2600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5745M

The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.

Core Duo T2600

The Core Duo T2600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,765 points. Launch price was $440.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5745M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5745M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 2.16 GHz on the Core Duo T2600 — a 29.2% clock advantage for the A10-5745M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.16 GHz). The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2600 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Core Duo T2600's 1,765 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-5745M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-5745M	Core Duo T2600
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+34%	2.16 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.16 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,767	1,765

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5745M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5745M	Core Duo T2600
Socket	FP2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-5745M) / not specified (Core Duo T2600). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Core Duo T2600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U.