Celeron M 743
VS
A6-3420M

Celeron M 743 vs A6-3420M

Intel

Celeron M 743

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A6-3420M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 743 is positioned at rank 1029 and the A6-3420M is on rank 837, so the A6-3420M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 743

#1017
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2372%
#1018
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2337%
#1019
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2146%
#1020
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2136%
#1021
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2116%
#1023
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2044%
#1024
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1960%
#1025
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1956%
#1026
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1904%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
95%
#1042
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#1043
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
94%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3420M

#824
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1344%
#825
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1324%
#826
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1216%
#827
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1210%
#828
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1199%
#830
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1158%
#831
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1110%
#832
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1109%
#833
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1079%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
A6-3420M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#851
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-3420M leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron M 743 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron M 743A6-3420M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron M 743A6-3420M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 743 and A6-3420M

Intel

Celeron M 743

The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

A6-3420M

The A6-3420M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,310 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 743 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the A6-3420M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3420M has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 versus 2.4 GHz on the A6-3420M — a 59.5% clock advantage for the A6-3420M. The Celeron M 743 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A6-3420M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 743 scores 1,324 against the A6-3420M's 1,310 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron M 743.

FeatureCeleron M 743A6-3420M
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.4 GHz+85%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,324+1%
1,310
Geekbench 6 Single
234
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 743 uses the BGA965 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A6-3420M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M 743A6-3420M
Socket
BGA965
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M 743) / AMD-V (A6-3420M). The A6-3420M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Celeron M 743 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3420M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3420M rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureCeleron M 743A6-3420M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6520G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop