Celeron M 743 vs Xeon 5148

Intel

Celeron M 743

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 5148

2 Cores2 Thrd40 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Celeron M 743 vs Xeon 5148 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 743 vs Xeon 5148 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 743 vs Xeon 5148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 743

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 40W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 5148, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Xeon 5148 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 5148

2006

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,315 vs 1,324).
  • 3900% higher power demand at 40W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 743 better than Xeon 5148?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5148 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron M 743 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 743 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron M 743 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 743 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon 5148 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron M 743 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 743 vs Xeon 5148 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron M 743

The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Xeon 5148

The Xeon 5148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,315 points. Launch price was $9.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 743 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Xeon 5148 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon 5148 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 versus 2.33 GHz on the Xeon 5148 — a 56.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 5148. The Celeron M 743 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon 5148 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 743 scores 1,324 against the Xeon 5148's 1,315 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron M 743.

FeatureCeleron M 743Xeon 5148
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.33 GHz+79%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark
1,324
1,315
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 743 uses the BGA965 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 5148 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M 743Xeon 5148
Socket
BGA965
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%