Celeron M 743 vs Pentium E5200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 743 vs Pentium E5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 743 vs Pentium E5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 743

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).

Pentium E5200

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $23 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,315 vs 1,324).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 743 better than Pentium E5200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E5200 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 743 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 743 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 743 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron M 743 comes in 27.4% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Pentium E5200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 26.5% better value on paper (15.7 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron M 743 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 743 vs Pentium E5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 743

The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E5200

The Pentium E5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Agosto 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,315 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 743 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium E5200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E5200 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium E5200 — a 63.2% clock advantage for the Pentium E5200. The Celeron M 743 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium E5200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 743 scores 1,324 against the Pentium E5200's 1,315 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron M 743.

Feature	Celeron M 743	Pentium E5200
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+92%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,324	1,315

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 743 uses the BGA965 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E5200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M 743	Pentium E5200
Socket	BGA965	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 743 was priced at $107, while the Pentium E5200 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($107 vs $84), Pentium E5200 was $23 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 743 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Pentium E5200 — making the Pentium E5200 the 23.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 743	Pentium E5200
MSRP	$107	$84-21%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	15.7+27%
Release Date	2009	2008

Search Celeron M 743 on Amazon

Search Pentium E5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.