Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Celeron M 743

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Celeron M 743 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 743

1 / 1

1,324

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Celeron M 743 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Celeron M 743: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $27 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Celeron M 743

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,331).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L335 better than Celeron M 743?

Yes. Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L335 comes in $27 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 34.5% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Celeron M 743 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron M 743

The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 743 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L335 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Athlon Neo X2 L335. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron M 743 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Celeron M 743's 1,324 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Celeron M 743
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,331	1,324

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 743 uses BGA965 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Celeron M 743
Socket	ASB1	BGA965
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 was priced at $80, while the Celeron M 743 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($80 vs $107), Athlon Neo X2 L335 was $27 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the Celeron M 743 — making the Athlon Neo X2 L335 the 29.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Celeron M 743
MSRP	$80-25%	$107
Performance per Dollar	16.6+34%	12.4
Release Date	2009	2009

Search Athlon Neo X2 L335 on Amazon

Search Celeron M 743 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.