Athlon Neo X2 L335
Popular choices:
Celeron M 743
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Neo X2 L335
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $27 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.
Celeron M 743
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,331).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Athlon Neo X2 L335
2009Celeron M 743
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $27 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,331).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Neo X2 L335 better than Celeron M 743?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron M 743
Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743
The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 743 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L335 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Athlon Neo X2 L335. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron M 743 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Celeron M 743's 1,324 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz+23% | 1.3 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Congo (2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,331 | 1,324 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 743 uses BGA965 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | ASB1 | BGA965 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Celeron M 743 debuted at $107. On MSRP ($80 vs $107), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 is $27 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the Celeron M 743 — making the Athlon Neo X2 L335 the 29.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Celeron M 743 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-25% | $107 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6+34% | 12.4 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron M 743
