A6-9225 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

A6-9225 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Performance Spectrum

A6-9225

2 / 2

1,334

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9225 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9225 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9225

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Athlon Neo X2 L335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,334).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A6-9225 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9225 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

Yes. A6-9225 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-9225 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-9225 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9225 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-9225 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo X2 L335 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9225 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9225 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9225

The A6-9225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,334 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9225 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A6-9225 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — a 63.8% clock advantage for the A6-9225. The A6-9225 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9225 scores 1,334 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-9225.

Feature	A6-9225	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+94%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,334	1,331

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9225 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9225 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — the A6-9225 supports 166.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9225 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9225) vs 2 (Athlon Neo X2 L335). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9225) vs 0 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) — the A6-9225 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9225) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335).

Feature	A6-9225	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Socket	BGA	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+167%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0