A6-9225 vs Xeon L3110

A6-9225 vs Xeon L3110 Performance Spectrum

A6-9225

2 / 2

1,334

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L3110

1,338

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9225 vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9225 vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9225

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Xeon L3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,334 vs 1,338).

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,000 MSRP, while A6-9225 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L3110 better than A6-9225?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A6-9225 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L3110 is the better buy right now. Xeon L3110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9225 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9225 vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9225

The A6-9225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,334 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-9225 is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-9225 scores 1,334 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon L3110.

Feature	A6-9225	Xeon L3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	1,334	1,338