A6-9225 vs Core i3-L13G4

A6-9225 vs Core i3-L13G4 Performance Spectrum

A6-9225

2 / 2

1,334

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-L13G4

5 / 5

1,349

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9225 vs Core i3-L13G4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9225 vs Core i3-L13G4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9225

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,334 vs 1,349).

Core i3-L13G4

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 7W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-L13G4 better than A6-9225?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9225 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-L13G4 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-L13G4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-L13G4 still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-L13G4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-L13G4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9225 vs Core i3-L13G4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9225

The A6-9225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,334 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-9225 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i3-L13G4 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i3-L13G4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A6-9225 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-L13G4 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the A6-9225 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The A6-9225 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9225 scores 1,334 against the Core i3-L13G4's 1,349 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-L13G4.

Feature	A6-9225	Core i3-L13G4
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	5 / 5+150%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+11%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+225%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Lakefield (2020)
PassMark	1,334	1,349+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9225 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-L13G4 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9225 versus LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i3-L13G4 — the Core i3-L13G4 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9225) vs 4 (Core i3-L13G4). Both provide 8 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-9225	Core i3-L13G4
Socket	BGA	FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	LPDDR4x-4267+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	4+300%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9225) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-L13G4). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9225) and UHD Graphics (Core i3-L13G4) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-L13G4 targets Mobile.