A6-9225 vs Celeron 3865U

A6-9225 vs Celeron 3865U Performance Spectrum

A6-9225

2 / 2

1,334

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 3865U

2 / 2

1,343

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9225 vs Celeron 3865U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9225 vs Celeron 3865U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9225

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,334 vs 1,343).

Celeron 3865U

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9225 better than Celeron 3865U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9225 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3865U pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3865U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9225 still makes the most sense overall. A6-9225 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9225 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9225 vs Celeron 3865U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9225

The A6-9225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,334 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A6-9225 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U — a 53.1% clock advantage for the A6-9225 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-9225 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron 3865U uses Kaby Lake-U (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9225 scores 1,334 against the Celeron 3865U's 1,343 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 3865U.

Feature	A6-9225	Celeron 3865U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+44%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Kaby Lake-U (2017)
PassMark	1,334	1,343
Geekbench 6 Single	—	389
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	674

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9225 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3865U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. The Celeron 3865U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9225) vs 2 (Celeron 3865U). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9225) vs 10 (Celeron 3865U) — the Celeron 3865U offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9225) and 100-series,200-series (Celeron 3865U).

Feature	A6-9225	Celeron 3865U
Socket	BGA	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	10+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9225) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9225) and Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3865U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.