Athlon II X2 270 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

Athlon II X2 270 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 270

2 / 2

1,333

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 270 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 270 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 270

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($72 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($72 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,333).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $72 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 270.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 270 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

Yes. Athlon II X2 270 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 270 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 270 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 270 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 270 comes in $8 cheaper on MSRP at $72 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.3% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X2 270 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 270 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 270

The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 270 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — a 72% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 270. The Athlon II X2 270 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270 scores 1,333 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 270.

Feature	Athlon II X2 270	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+112%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,333	1,331
Geekbench 6 Single	392	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	686	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 270 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 270 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — the Athlon II X2 270 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 270 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 270) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335).

Feature	Athlon II X2 270	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Socket	AM3	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333+67%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 270) / not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L335). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700.

Feature	Athlon II X2 270	Athlon Neo X2 L335
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 270 was priced at $72, while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($72 vs $80), Athlon II X2 270 was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 270 delivers 18.5 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — making the Athlon II X2 270 the 10.7% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 270	Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP	$72-10%	$80
Performance per Dollar	18.5+11%	16.6
Release Date	2011	2009

Search Athlon II X2 270 on Amazon

Search Athlon Neo X2 L335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.