Athlon II X2 270 vs Core 2 Duo U7700
Athlon II X2 270
Core 2 Duo U7700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 270 is positioned at rank 825 and the Core 2 Duo U7700 is on rank 1203, so the Athlon II X2 270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo U7700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X2 270 | Core 2 Duo U7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom-2048 (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X2 270 | Core 2 Duo U7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+50%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 270 and Core 2 Duo U7700
Athlon II X2 270
The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.
Core 2 Duo U7700
The Core 2 Duo U7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2048 (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,335 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 270 and Core 2 Duo U7700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 versus 1.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo U7700 — a 87.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 270 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Athlon II X2 270 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo U7700 uses Merom-2048 (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270 scores 1,333 against the Core 2 Duo U7700's 1,335 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo U7700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core 2 Duo U7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+156% | 1.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+156% | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,333 | 1,335 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 392 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 686 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 270 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo U7700 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core 2 Duo U7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 270) / not specified (Core 2 Duo U7700). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core 2 Duo U7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 270 launched at $72 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo U7700 debuted at $262. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo U7700 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 270 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 133.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo U7700 — making the Core 2 Duo U7700 the 40.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270 | Core 2 Duo U7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $72-73% | $262 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9 | 133.5+50% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 270 and Core 2 Duo U7700
