Athlon II X2 270 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Athlon II X2 270 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 270

2 / 2

1,333

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 / 2

1,339

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 270 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 270 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 270

2011

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,339).
❌Launch MSRP is still $72 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 270.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 270 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X2 270 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 270 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 270 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $72 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X2 270 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X2 270 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 270

The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 270 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 56.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 270. The Athlon II X2 270 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270 scores 1,333 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Feature	Athlon II X2 270	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+79%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,333	1,339
Geekbench 6 Single	392	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	686	—