Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Xeon L3110

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Xeon L3110 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L3110

1,338

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Xeon L3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Xeon L3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $920 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1143.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 1.3 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,338).
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Xeon L3110

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L3110 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L3110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L3110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L3110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon L3110 comes in 1150.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo X2 L335 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 1143.5% better value on paper (16.6 vs 1.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon L3110 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Xeon L3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon L3110

The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is built on the Congo (2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon L3110.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Xeon L3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Congo (2009)	—
PassMark	1,331	1,338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Xeon L3110
Socket	ASB1	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 was priced at $80, while the Xeon L3110 came in at $1000. On launch pricing ($80 vs $1000), Athlon Neo X2 L335 was $920 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 1.3 pts/$ for the Xeon L3110 — making the Athlon Neo X2 L335 the 170.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Xeon L3110
MSRP	$80-92%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	16.6+1177%	1.3
Release Date	2009	2009

Search Athlon Neo X2 L335 on Amazon

Search Xeon L3110 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.