
Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Xeon L3110

Athlon Neo X2 L335

Xeon L3110
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is positioned at rank 944 and the Xeon L3110 is on rank 1027, so the Athlon Neo X2 L335 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L335
Performance Per Dollar Xeon L3110
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Xeon L3110 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($950) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Xeon L3110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6200%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($950) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Xeon L3110

Athlon Neo X2 L335
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon L3110
The Xeon L3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,338 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is built on the Congo (2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Xeon L3110's 1,338 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon L3110.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Xeon L3110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Congo (2009) | — |
| PassMark | 1,331 | 1,338 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Xeon L3110 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | ASB1 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Neo X2 L335 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Xeon L3110 debuted at $1000. At current prices ($15 vs $950), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 is $935 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 delivers 88.7 pts/$ vs 1.4 pts/$ for the Xeon L3110 — making the Athlon Neo X2 L335 the 193.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Neo X2 L335 | Xeon L3110 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-92% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-98% | $950 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.7+6236% | 1.4 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















