Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2220

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2220 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Dual-Core E2220

2 / 2

1,330

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 41.6 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $32 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium Dual-Core E2220

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($32 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 149.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($32 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,330 vs 1,331).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2220 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Dual-Core E2220 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual-Core E2220 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual-Core E2220 comes in $48 cheaper on MSRP at $32 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon Neo X2 L335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 149.8% better value on MSRP (41.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium Dual-Core E2220

The Pentium Dual-Core E2220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,330 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 — a 40% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2220. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2220's 1,330 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Pentium Dual-Core E2220
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Congo (2009)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,331	1,330

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Pentium Dual-Core E2220
Socket	ASB1	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 was priced at $80, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 came in at $32. On launch pricing ($80 vs $32), Pentium Dual-Core E2220 was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 41.6 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 — making the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 the 85.7% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP	$80	$32-60%
Performance per Dollar	16.6	41.6+151%
Release Date	2009	2008

Search Athlon Neo X2 L335 on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual-Core E2220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.