Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Athlon X2 340

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Athlon X2 340 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 340

2 / 2

1,333

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Athlon X2 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Athlon X2 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,333).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 44.4 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 340.

Athlon X2 340

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 167.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($30 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 340 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

Yes. Athlon X2 340 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 340 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 340 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 340 comes in $50 cheaper on MSRP at $30 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 167.1% better value on MSRP (44.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 340 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Athlon X2 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X2 340

The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Athlon X2 340 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 — a 76.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X2 340 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Athlon X2 340's 1,333 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon X2 340.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Athlon X2 340
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+125%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,331	1,333
Geekbench 6 Single	—	397
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	549

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 340 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus DDR3-1600 on the Athlon X2 340 — the Athlon X2 340 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 340 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) vs 16 (Athlon X2 340) — the Athlon X2 340 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X2 340).

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Athlon X2 340
Socket	ASB1	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1600+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Neo X2 L335) / AMD-V (Athlon X2 340). Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Athlon X2 340
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 was priced at $80, while the Athlon X2 340 came in at $30. On launch pricing ($80 vs $30), Athlon X2 340 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Neo X2 L335 delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 340 — making the Athlon X2 340 the 91% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Athlon X2 340
MSRP	$80	$30-63%
Performance per Dollar	16.6	44.4+167%
Release Date	2009	2012

Search Athlon Neo X2 L335 on Amazon

Search Athlon X2 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.