Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 / 2

1,339

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,331 vs 1,339).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-58 better than Athlon Neo X2 L335?

Yes. Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 X2 TL-58 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon Neo X2 L335 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on ASB1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,331	1,339