Atom x7-Z8700 vs Celeron M 743

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Celeron M 743 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Celeron M 743: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-Z8700

2015

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Celeron M 743 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron M 743

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,324 vs 1,325).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Atom x7-Z8700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-Z8700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-Z8700 better than Celeron M 743?

Yes. Atom x7-Z8700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7-Z8700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-Z8700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-Z8700 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom x7-Z8700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 743 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Celeron M 743 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-Z8700

The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron M 743

The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 743 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom x7-Z8700 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 versus 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8700. The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M 743 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8700 scores 1,325 against the Celeron M 743's 1,324 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom x7-Z8700.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8700	Celeron M 743
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,325	1,324

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 743 uses BGA965 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8700	Celeron M 743
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	BGA965
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	2	—