Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Atom x7-Z8700

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Atom x7-Z8700 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 / 2

1,331

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x7-Z8700

4 / 4

1,325

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Atom x7-Z8700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Atom x7-Z8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Atom x7-Z8700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-Z8700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom x7-Z8700

2015

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Athlon Neo X2 L335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,325 vs 1,331).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L335 better than Atom x7-Z8700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x7-Z8700 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L335 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Atom x7-Z8700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Atom x7-Z8700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom x7-Z8700

The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x7-Z8700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 — a 40% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8700. The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom x7-Z8700 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L335 scores 1,331 against the Atom x7-Z8700's 1,325 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Atom x7-Z8700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	65 nm	14 nm-78%
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,331	1,325

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x7-Z8700 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8700 — the Atom x7-Z8700 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7-Z8700 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8700) — the Atom x7-Z8700 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8700).

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L335	Atom x7-Z8700
Socket	ASB1	UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	LPDDR3-1600+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	2