Atom x7-Z8700
VS
Core i5-480M

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Core i5-480M

Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 2.4 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i5-480M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-480M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
111%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
109%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
100%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
100%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
99%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
95%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
91%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
91%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
89%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
82%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
81%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-480M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom x7-Z8700 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom x7-Z8700Core i5-480M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom x7-Z8700Core i5-480M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7-Z8700 and Core i5-480M

Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-480M

The Core i5-480M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $81.

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-480M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-480M — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-480M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-480M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8700 scores 1,325 against the Core i5-480M's 1,327 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-480M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-Z8700 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-480M.

FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Core i5-480M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.93 GHz+22%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.66 GHz+66%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,325
1,327
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-480M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8700 versus 1066 on the Core i5-480M — the Core i5-480M supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 2 (Atom x7-Z8700) vs 16 (Core i5-480M) — the Core i5-480M offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8700) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-480M).

FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Core i5-480M
Socket
UTFCBGA1380
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1600
1066+35433%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+104857500%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
2
16+700%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7-Z8700) / true (Core i5-480M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8700) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-480M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-480M rivals AMD Turion II M620.

FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Core i5-480M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true