Celeron M P4600
VS
A6-3620

Celeron M P4600 vs A6-3620

Intel

Celeron M P4600

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A6-3620

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M P4600 is positioned at rank 836 and the A6-3620 is on rank 580, so the A6-3620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M P4600

#824
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1338%
#825
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1318%
#826
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1210%
#827
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1205%
#828
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1194%
#830
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1153%
#831
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1105%
#832
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1104%
#833
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1074%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9965%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9416%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6837%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2060%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1631%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1427%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
817%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
807%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
735%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
735%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
726%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
707%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
697%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
694%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
688%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
98%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#580
A6-3620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
99%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
99%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
99%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
98%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
98%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
97%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
96%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-3620 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron M P4600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron M P4600A6-3620
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron M P4600A6-3620
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M P4600 and A6-3620

Intel

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-3620 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 versus 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A6-3620. The Celeron M P4600 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-3620 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4600 scores 1,886 against the A6-3620's 1,877 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M P4600. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4600 vs 0 kB on the A6-3620.

FeatureCeleron M P4600A6-3620
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,886
1,877
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-3620 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M P4600A6-3620
Socket
PGA988
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M P4600) / AMD-V (A6-3620). The A6-3620 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Celeron M P4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840.

FeatureCeleron M P4600A6-3620
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop