Celeron M P4600 vs Pentium G3220

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4600 vs Pentium G3220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4600 vs Pentium G3220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 34.9 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $54 MSRP).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G3220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium G3220

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($54 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.9 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($54 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,885 vs 1,886).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3220 better than Celeron M P4600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3220 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4600 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Pentium G3220 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3220 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3220 comes in $32 cheaper on MSRP at $54 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron M P4600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 59.2% better value on MSRP (34.9 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M P4600 vs Pentium G3220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium G3220

The Pentium G3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,885 points. Launch price was $71.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron M P4600 and Pentium G3220 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G3220 — a 40% clock advantage for the Pentium G3220. The Celeron M P4600 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3220 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4600 scores 1,886 against the Pentium G3220's 1,885 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron M P4600. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4600 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220.

Feature	Celeron M P4600	Pentium G3220
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,886	1,885

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3220 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M P4600	Pentium G3220
Socket	PGA988	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M P4600) / VT-x (Pentium G3220). The Pentium G3220 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Celeron M P4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3220 targets Desktop.

Feature	Celeron M P4600	Pentium G3220
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M P4600 was priced at $86, while the Pentium G3220 came in at $54. On launch pricing ($86 vs $54), Pentium G3220 was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M P4600 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 34.9 pts/$ for the Pentium G3220 — making the Pentium G3220 the 45.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M P4600	Pentium G3220
MSRP	$86	$54-37%
Performance per Dollar	21.9	34.9+59%
Release Date	2010	2013

Search Celeron M P4600 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.