Celeron G3900T vs Celeron M P4600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900T vs Celeron M P4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900T vs Celeron M P4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900T

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 106.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron M P4600

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G3900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,886 vs 1,900).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900T better than Celeron M P4600?

Yes. Celeron G3900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900T comes in $44 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 106.3% better value on MSRP (45.2 vs 21.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900T vs Celeron M P4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900T and Celeron M P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900T. The Celeron G3900T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M P4600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900T scores 1,900 against the Celeron M P4600's 1,886 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G3900T. Both processors carry 2 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Celeron M P4600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,900	1,886
Geekbench 6 Single	514	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Celeron M P4600
Socket	LGA1151	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900T) / not specified (Celeron M P4600). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Celeron M P4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Celeron M P4600
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900T was priced at $42, while the Celeron M P4600 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($42 vs $86), Celeron G3900T was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900T delivers 45.2 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Celeron M P4600 — making the Celeron G3900T the 69.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Celeron M P4600
MSRP	$42-51%	$86
Performance per Dollar	45.2+106%	21.9
Release Date	2015	2010

Search Celeron G3900T on Amazon

Search Celeron M P4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.