Celeron G3900T vs Core M-5Y70
Celeron G3900T
Core M-5Y70
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3900T is positioned at rank 451 and the Core M-5Y70 is on rank 1171, so the Celeron G3900T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900T
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y70
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3900T | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($70) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3900T | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+304%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($70) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3900T and Core M-5Y70
Celeron G3900T
The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.
Core M-5Y70
The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core M-5Y70's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G3900T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core M-5Y70 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900T scores 1,900 against the Core M-5Y70's 1,890 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3900T. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+136% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,900 | 1,890 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 514 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 903 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y70 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900T) / not specified (Core M-5Y70). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3900T launched at $42 MSRP, while the Core M-5Y70 debuted at $281. At current prices ($70 vs $281), the Celeron G3900T is $211 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900T delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y70 — making the Celeron G3900T the 120.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-85% | $281 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-75% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.1+304% | 6.7 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3900T and Core M-5Y70
