Celeron G3900T vs Xeon E5507

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900T vs Xeon E5507 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900T vs Xeon E5507: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900T

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Xeon E5507 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,900 vs 1,905).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5507, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon E5507 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5507

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900T better than Xeon E5507?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5507 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G3900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5507 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5507 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (45.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3900T vs Xeon E5507 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5507

The Xeon E5507 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $457.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5507 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5507 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5507 — a 162.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Celeron G3900T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5507 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900T scores 1,900 against the Xeon E5507's 1,905 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5507. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5507.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Xeon E5507
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+863%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+15%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,900	1,905
Geekbench 6 Single	514	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5507 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Xeon E5507
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3900T) / not specified (Xeon E5507). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon E5507 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.