Celeron G3900T
VS
Pentium Dual Core T2410

Celeron G3900T vs Pentium Dual Core T2410

Intel

Celeron G3900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2410

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3900T is positioned at rank 451 and the Pentium Dual Core T2410 is on rank 902, so the Celeron G3900T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6890%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6511%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4727%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1424%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1128%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
987%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
565%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
558%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
508%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
508%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
502%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
489%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
482%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
480%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
476%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
100%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
100%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
99%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
98%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
100%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
100%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
99%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
98%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T2410

#890
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1547%
#891
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1525%
#892
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1400%
#893
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1393%
#894
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1381%
#896
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1333%
#897
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1278%
#898
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1276%
#899
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1242%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#904
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
99%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3900T (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G3900TPentium Dual Core T2410
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($70)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G3900TPentium Dual Core T2410
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+43%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($70)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3900T and Pentium Dual Core T2410

Intel

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2410

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,896 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900T and Pentium Dual Core T2410 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900T. The Celeron G3900T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900T scores 1,900 against the Pentium Dual Core T2410's 1,896 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G3900T.

FeatureCeleron G3900TPentium Dual Core T2410
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,900
1,896
Geekbench 6 Single
514
Geekbench 6 Multi
903
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T versus 667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — the Pentium Dual Core T2410 supports 197.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900T) and Socket P (Pentium Dual Core T2410).

FeatureCeleron G3900TPentium Dual Core T2410
Socket
LGA1151
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
667+16575%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+1677721500%
4
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3900T) vs false (Pentium Dual Core T2410). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

FeatureCeleron G3900TPentium Dual Core T2410
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
false
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G3900T launched at $42 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 debuted at $100. At current prices ($70 vs $100), the Celeron G3900T is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900T delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — making the Celeron G3900T the 35.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G3900TPentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP
$42-58%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$70-30%
$100
Performance per Dollar
27.1+43%
19.0
Release Date
2015
2008