
Celeron G3900T

Pentium Dual Core T2410
Celeron G3900T vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3900T vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3900T vs Pentium Dual Core T2410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3900T
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.2 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Pentium Dual Core T2410 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Pentium Dual Core T2410
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,896 vs 1,900).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.0 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3900T better than Pentium Dual Core T2410?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3900T vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900T
The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Dual Core T2410
The Pentium Dual Core T2410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,896 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G3900T and Pentium Dual Core T2410 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900T. The Celeron G3900T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900T scores 1,900 against the Pentium Dual Core T2410's 1,896 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G3900T.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Pentium Dual Core T2410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+30% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,900 | 1,896 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 514 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 903 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T versus 667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — the Celeron G3900T supports 219.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900T) and Socket P (Pentium Dual Core T2410).
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Pentium Dual Core T2410 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+220% | 667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1500% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3900T) vs false (Pentium Dual Core T2410). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Pentium Dual Core T2410 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | false |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3900T was priced at $42, while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($42 vs $100), Celeron G3900T was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900T delivers 45.2 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — making the Celeron G3900T the 81.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3900T | Pentium Dual Core T2410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-58% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.2+138% | 19.0 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














