PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron G3900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron G3900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1850

2014

Why buy it

✅+5.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

Celeron G3900T

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (514 vs 543).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (903 vs 945).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1850 better than Celeron G3900T?

Yes. Celeron G1850 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.7% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.4% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1850 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1850 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $42 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.4% better value on MSRP (45.4 vs 45.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron G3900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1850 and Celeron G3900T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G3900T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Celeron G3900T's 1,900 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1850. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 543 vs 514, a 5.5% lead for the Celeron G1850 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 945 vs 903 (4.5% advantage for the Celeron G1850). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1850 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron G3900T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,907	1,900
Geekbench 6 Single	543+6%	514
Geekbench 6 Multi	945+5%	903

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T — the Celeron G3900T supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1850) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900T).

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron G3900T
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-2133+60%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1850) and HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget, Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258; Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron G3900T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	HD Graphics 510
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1850 was priced at $42, while the Celeron G3900T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($42 vs $42), Celeron G3900T was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1850 delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 45.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900T — making the Celeron G1850 the 0.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron G3900T
MSRP	$42	$42
Performance per Dollar	45.4	45.2
Release Date	2014	2015

Search Celeron G1850 on Amazon

Search Celeron G3900T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.