Celeron G1850
VS
Celeron M 575

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron M 575

Intel

Celeron G1850

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1850 is positioned at rank 450 and the Celeron M 575 is on rank 827, so the Celeron G1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1850

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6866%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6488%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4711%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1419%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1124%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
983%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
563%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
556%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
506%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
506%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
500%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
487%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
480%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
478%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
474%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
99%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
99%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
99%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
98%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
100%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
100%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
99%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
99%
#463
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1316%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1297%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1191%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1185%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1174%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1134%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1087%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1086%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1057%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#828
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1850 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G1850Celeron M 575
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($12)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron M 575 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G1850Celeron M 575
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+151%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($12)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1850 and Celeron M 575

Intel

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Intel

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 575 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron G1850 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850. The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M 575 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Celeron M 575's 1,917 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 575.

FeatureCeleron G1850Celeron M 575
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,907
1,917
Geekbench 6 Single
543
Geekbench 6 Multi
945
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 575 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 versus 800 on the Celeron M 575 — the Celeron M 575 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1850 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1850) vs 0 (Celeron M 575) — the Celeron G1850 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1850) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 575).

FeatureCeleron G1850Celeron M 575
Socket
LGA1150
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
800+26567%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+838860700%
4
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1850) vs false (Celeron M 575). The Celeron G1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Celeron M 575 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258; Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeatureCeleron G1850Celeron M 575
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
false
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G1850 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Celeron M 575 debuted at $86. At current prices ($30 vs $12), the Celeron M 575 is $18 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1850 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 159.8 pts/$ for the Celeron M 575 — making the Celeron M 575 the 86.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G1850Celeron M 575
MSRP
$42-51%
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$12-60%
Performance per Dollar
63.6
159.8+151%
Release Date
2014
2008