PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron M 575 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron M 575: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1850

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Celeron M 575 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,907 vs 1,917).
❌5300% higher power demand at 54W vs 1W.

Celeron M 575

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 54W, a 53W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 45.4 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1850 better than Celeron M 575?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1850 is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 575 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 575 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1850 comes in $44 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron M 575 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 103.7% better value on MSRP (45.4 vs 22.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1850 vs Celeron M 575 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 575 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron G1850 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850. The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M 575 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Celeron M 575's 1,917 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 575.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron M 575
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,907	1,917
Geekbench 6 Single	543	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	945	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 575 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 versus 800 on the Celeron M 575 — the Celeron G1850 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1850 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1850) vs 0 (Celeron M 575) — the Celeron G1850 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1850) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 575).

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron M 575
Socket	LGA1150	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1850) vs false (Celeron M 575). The Celeron G1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Celeron M 575 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258; Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron M 575
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	false
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1850 was priced at $42, while the Celeron M 575 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($42 vs $86), Celeron G1850 was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1850 delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the Celeron M 575 — making the Celeron G1850 the 68.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Celeron M 575
MSRP	$42-51%	$86
Performance per Dollar	45.4+104%	22.3
Release Date	2014	2008

Search Celeron G1850 on Amazon

Search Celeron M 575 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.