
Celeron G1850

Core 2 Quad Q8300
Celeron G1850 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1850 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1850 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1850
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $137 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- β Delivers 324.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- β Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Core 2 Quad Q8300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,907 vs 1,917).
Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 45.4 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- β75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron G1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G1850 better than Core 2 Quad Q8300?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1850 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1850
The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Core 2 Quad Q8300
The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007β2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 β a 14.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses Yorkfield (2007β2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 β a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8300. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1850 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300.
| Feature | Celeron G1850 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Yorkfield (2007β2009) |
| PassMark | 1,907 | 1,917 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 543 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 945 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G1850 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1850) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300). The Celeron G1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.
| Feature | Celeron G1850 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1850 was priced at $42, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 came in at $179. On launch pricing ($42 vs $179), Celeron G1850 was $137 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1850 delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q8300 β making the Celeron G1850 the 123.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1850 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-77% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4+324% | 10.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














