Celeron G1850 vs Core i3-3130M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1850 vs Core i3-3130M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1850 vs Core i3-3130M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1850

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $183 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 436.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 8.5 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-3130M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,907).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.5 vs 45.4 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1850 better than Core i3-3130M?

Yes. Celeron G1850 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1850 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1850 comes in $183 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 436.0% better value on MSRP (45.4 vs 8.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1850 vs Core i3-3130M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Core i3-3130M

The Core i3-3130M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3130M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-3130M — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-3130M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Core i3-3130M's 1,906 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1850. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core i3-3130M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,907	1,906
Geekbench 6 Single	543	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	945	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3130M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 versus 1600 on the Core i3-3130M — the Core i3-3130M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1850) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i3-3130M).

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core i3-3130M
Socket	LGA1150	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1850) vs true (Core i3-3130M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1850) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3130M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258; Core i3-3130M rivals AMD A8-4500M.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core i3-3130M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1850 was priced at $42, while the Core i3-3130M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($42 vs $225), Celeron G1850 was $183 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1850 delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 8.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-3130M — making the Celeron G1850 the 137.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core i3-3130M
MSRP	$42-81%	$225
Performance per Dollar	45.4+434%	8.5
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Celeron G1850 on Amazon

Search Core i3-3130M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.