Celeron G1850 vs Opteron 3320 EE

Celeron G1850 vs Opteron 3320 EE Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1850

2 / 2

1,907

0.0%

1,918

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1850 vs Opteron 3320 EE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1850 vs Opteron 3320 EE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1850

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Opteron 3320 EE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,907 vs 1,918).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3320 EE, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Opteron 3320 EE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌116% higher power demand at 54W vs 25W.

Opteron 3320 EE

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 54W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1850 better than Opteron 3320 EE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3320 EE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G1850 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3320 EE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Opteron 3320 EE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (45.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1850 vs Opteron 3320 EE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 3320 EE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3320 EE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Opteron 3320 EE's 1,918 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 3320 EE. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1850 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3320 EE.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Opteron 3320 EE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+53%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,907	1,918
Geekbench 6 Single	543	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	945	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Opteron 3320 EE
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1850) / not specified (Opteron 3320 EE). The Celeron G1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Opteron 3320 EE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.