Athlon 5370 vs Celeron G3900T

CPU

GPU

Athlon 5370

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G3900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron G3900T Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5370

4 / 4

1,906

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3900T

2 / 2

1,900

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron G3900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron G3900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5370

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron G3900T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (247 vs 514).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (636 vs 903).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.7 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Celeron G3900T

2015

Why buy it

✅+108.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.2 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900T better than Athlon 5370?

Yes. Celeron G3900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 42% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 42% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900T comes in $13 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 30.5% better value on MSRP (45.2 vs 34.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron G3900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370

The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G3900T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Celeron G3900T's 1,900 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 5370. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 247 vs 514, a 70.2% lead for the Celeron G3900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 636 vs 903 (34.7% advantage for the Celeron G3900T).

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron G3900T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,906	1,900
Geekbench 6 Single	247	514+108%
Geekbench 6 Multi	636	903+42%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Athlon 5370 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T — the Celeron G3900T supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5370) vs 2 (Celeron G3900T). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5370) vs 16 (Celeron G3900T) — the Celeron G3900T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1,A50M (Athlon 5370) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900T).

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron G3900T
Socket	AM1	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) vs VT-x (Celeron G3900T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R3 (Athlon 5370) and HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget, Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron G3900T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R3	HD Graphics 510
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Celeron G3900T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($55 vs $42), Celeron G3900T was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 45.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900T — making the Celeron G3900T the 26.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron G3900T
MSRP	$55	$42-24%
Performance per Dollar	34.7	45.2+30%
Release Date	2014	2015

Search Athlon 5370 on Amazon

Search Celeron G3900T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.