Athlon 5370 vs Celeron B800

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron B800 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5370

4 / 4

1,906

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron B800

2 / 2

1,910

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron B800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron B800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5370

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.7 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron B800.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,910).

Celeron B800

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5370 better than Celeron B800?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 5370 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B800 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5370 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5370 comes in $25 cheaper on MSRP at $55 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron B800 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 45.1% better value on MSRP (34.7 vs 23.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron B800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370

The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron B800

The Celeron B800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron B800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron B800 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 5370 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron B800 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Celeron B800's 1,910 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron B800.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron B800
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+47%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+47%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,906	1,910
Geekbench 6 Single	247	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	636	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron B800 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Athlon 5370 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B800 — the Athlon 5370 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5370) vs 2 (Celeron B800). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5370) vs 16 (Celeron B800) — the Celeron B800 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1,A50M (Athlon 5370) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B800).

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron B800
Socket	AM1	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) vs VT-x (Celeron B800). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R3 (Athlon 5370) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B800) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget, Celeron B800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B800 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron B800
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R3	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Celeron B800 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($55 vs $80), Athlon 5370 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 23.9 pts/$ for the Celeron B800 — making the Athlon 5370 the 36.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron B800
MSRP	$55-31%	$80
Performance per Dollar	34.7+45%	23.9
Release Date	2014	2011

Search Athlon 5370 on Amazon

Search Celeron B800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.