Athlon 5370 vs Opteron 3320 EE

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron 3320 EE Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5370

4 / 4

1,906

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Opteron 3320 EE

4 / 4

1,918

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron 3320 EE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron 3320 EE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5370

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Opteron 3320 EE needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Opteron 3320 EE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,918).
❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while Opteron 3320 EE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 3320 EE

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3320 EE better than Athlon 5370?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3320 EE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon 5370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3320 EE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 37 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3320 EE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3320 EE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 3320 EE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron 3320 EE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370

The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 5370 and Opteron 3320 EE share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 3320 EE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Opteron 3320 EE's 1,918 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 3320 EE.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Opteron 3320 EE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+16%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB	4096 kB+100%
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,906	1,918
Geekbench 6 Single	247	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	636	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Opteron 3320 EE
Socket	AM1	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) / not specified (Opteron 3320 EE). The Athlon 5370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Opteron 3320 EE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget.