
Athlon 5370

Core M-5Y10a
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y10a Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y10a FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Cyberpunk 2077
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y10a: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 5370
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 411.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.7 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core M-5Y10a.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core M-5Y10a
2014Why buy it
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 1,906).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 5370 better than Core M-5Y10a?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y10a Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370
The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Core M-5Y10a
The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y10a offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 5370 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core M-5Y10a uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Core M-5Y10a's 1,905 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 5370.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y10a |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+175% | 0.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,906 | 1,905 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 247 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 636 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y10a uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5370) vs 2 (Core M-5Y10a). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5370) vs 12 (Core M-5Y10a) — the Core M-5Y10a offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y10a |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | LPDDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 12+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10a). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R3 (Athlon 5370) and HD Graphics 5300 (Core M-5Y10a) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget, Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y10a |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 | HD Graphics 5300 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Core M-5Y10a came in at $281. On launch pricing ($55 vs $281), Athlon 5370 was $226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y10a — making the Athlon 5370 the 134.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y10a |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-80% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.7+410% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















