Athlon 5370 vs Celeron M 575

CPU

GPU

Athlon 5370

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron M 575 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5370

4 / 4

1,906

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 575

1 / 1

1,917

+0.6%

Pentium 3556U

Pentium Dual Core T4400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron M 575 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron M 575: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5370

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.7 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Celeron M 575 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron M 575.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,917).
❌2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.

Celeron M 575

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5370 better than Celeron M 575?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 5370 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 575 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 575 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5370 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5370 comes in $31 cheaper on MSRP at $55 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron M 575 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 55.5% better value on MSRP (34.7 vs 22.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 5370 vs Celeron M 575 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370

The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 575 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon 5370 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 5370. The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron M 575 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Celeron M 575's 1,917 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron M 575.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron M 575
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,906	1,917
Geekbench 6 Single	247	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	636	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 575 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Athlon 5370 versus 800 on the Celeron M 575 — the Athlon 5370 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5370 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5370) vs 2 (Celeron M 575). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5370) vs 0 (Celeron M 575) — the Athlon 5370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1,A50M (Athlon 5370) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 575).

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron M 575
Socket	AM1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) vs false (Celeron M 575). The Athlon 5370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Celeron M 575 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron M 575
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R3	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	false
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Celeron M 575 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($55 vs $86), Athlon 5370 was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the Celeron M 575 — making the Athlon 5370 the 43.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Celeron M 575
MSRP	$55-36%	$86
Performance per Dollar	34.7+56%	22.3
Release Date	2014	2008

Search Athlon 5370 on Amazon

Search Celeron M 575 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.