Athlon 5370 vs Opteron X2170

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron X2170 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5370

4 / 4

1,906

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Opteron X2170

4 / 4

1,911

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron X2170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron X2170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5370

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Opteron X2170 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Opteron X2170.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,911).
❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while Opteron X2170 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron X2170

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X2170 better than Athlon 5370?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X2170 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon 5370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron X2170 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron X2170 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X2170 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron X2170 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X2170 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 5370 vs Opteron X2170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370

The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron X2170

The Opteron X2170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Steppe Eagle (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,911 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 5370 and Opteron X2170 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron X2170 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Opteron X2170 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Opteron X2170 uses Steppe Eagle (2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Opteron X2170's 1,911 — a 0.3% lead for the Opteron X2170.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Opteron X2170
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB (total)
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Steppe Eagle (2016)
PassMark	1,906	1,911
Geekbench 6 Single	247	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	636	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron X2170 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 5370	Opteron X2170
Socket	AM1	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) / not specified (Opteron X2170). The Athlon 5370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Opteron X2170 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget.