
Athlon 5370

Core M-5Y31
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y31 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y31 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y31: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 5370
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 411.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.7 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core M-5Y31
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 5370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 1,906).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 5370 better than Core M-5Y31?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 5370 vs Core M-5Y31 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370
The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Core M-5Y31
The Core M-5Y31 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y31 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core M-5Y31 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y31 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core M-5Y31 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Core M-5Y31's 1,905 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 5370.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y31 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+144% | 0.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,906 | 1,905 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 247 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 636 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y31 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y31 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) / not specified (Core M-5Y31). The Athlon 5370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Core M-5Y31 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y31 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Core M-5Y31 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($55 vs $281), Athlon 5370 was $226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y31 — making the Athlon 5370 the 134.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core M-5Y31 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-80% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.7+410% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















