
Athlon 5370

Core 2 Quad Q8300
Athlon 5370 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 5370 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Athlon 5370 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 5370
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.7 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Core 2 Quad Q8300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,917).
Core 2 Quad Q8300
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Quad Q8300 better than Athlon 5370?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 5370 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370
The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Quad Q8300
The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 5370 and Core 2 Quad Q8300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8300 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8300.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,906 | 1,917 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 247 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 636 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300). The Athlon 5370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 came in at $179. On launch pricing ($55 vs $179), Athlon 5370 was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — making the Athlon 5370 the 105.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-69% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.7+224% | 10.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















