Athlon 5370 vs V-Series V140

AMD

Athlon 5370

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

V-Series V140

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 5370 vs V-Series V140 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5370 vs V-Series V140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5370 vs V-Series V140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5370

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while V-Series V140 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike V-Series V140.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,906 vs 1,913).
  • Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while V-Series V140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V140

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.

    Quick Answers

    So, is V-Series V140 better than Athlon 5370?
    Yes. V-Series V140 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, V-Series V140 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    V-Series V140 is still the much better call for a fresh build. V-Series V140 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (34.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon 5370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon 5370 vs V-Series V140 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 5370

    The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    V-Series V140

    The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V140 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon 5370 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the V-Series V140. The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.4% lead for the V-Series V140.

    FeatureAthlon 5370V-Series V140
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+300%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.3 GHz+5%
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz
    L2 Cache
    2048 kB+300%
    512 kB
    Process
    28 nm-38%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Kabini (2013−2014)
    Champlain (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    1,906
    1,913
    Geekbench 6 Single
    247
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    636
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon 5370V-Series V140
    Socket
    AM1
    S1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) / not specified (V-Series V140). The Athlon 5370 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the V-Series V140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget.

    FeatureAthlon 5370V-Series V140
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon R3
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Budget