Celeron M P4600 vs Xeon E5507

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M P4600 vs Xeon E5507 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M P4600 vs Xeon E5507: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M P4600

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,886 vs 1,905).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5507, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Xeon E5507 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon E5507

2010

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5507 better than Celeron M P4600?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5507 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron M P4600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5507 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5507 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5507 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. Celeron M P4600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5507 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M P4600 vs Xeon E5507 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M P4600

The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.

Xeon E5507

The Xeon E5507 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $457.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M P4600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5507 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5507 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5507 — a 152.4% clock advantage for the Celeron M P4600. The Celeron M P4600 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5507 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M P4600 scores 1,886 against the Xeon E5507's 1,905 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5507. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron M P4600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5507.

Feature	Celeron M P4600	Xeon E5507
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz+641%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,886	1,905+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5507 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.