Celeron N2815
VS
Celeron N2820

Celeron N2815 vs Celeron N2820

Intel

Celeron N2815

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron N2820

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.39 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2815 is positioned at rank 405 and the Celeron N2820 is on rank 259, so the Celeron N2820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2815

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
98%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#393
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
549%
#394
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
541%
#395
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
497%
#396
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
495%
#397
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
490%
#399
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
473%
#400
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
454%
#401
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
453%
#402
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
441%
#405
Celeron N2815
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2820

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#247
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
415%
#248
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
409%
#249
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
375%
#250
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#251
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
370%
#253
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
357%
#254
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#255
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
342%
#256
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
333%
#259
Celeron N2820
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2820 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N2815 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N2815Celeron N2820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2815Celeron N2820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2815 and Celeron N2820

Intel

Celeron N2815

The Celeron N2815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,068 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Celeron N2820

The Celeron N2820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,061 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2815 and Celeron N2820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron N2815 versus 2.39 GHz on the Celeron N2820 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N2820 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). Both are built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron N2815 scores 1,068 against the Celeron N2820's 1,061 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N2815. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron N2815 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2820.

FeatureCeleron N2815Celeron N2820
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.13 GHz
2.39 GHz+12%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2.13 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
1 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,068
1,061
Geekbench 6 Single
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2815 versus DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2820 — the Celeron N2815 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2815) and SoC (Celeron N2820).

FeatureCeleron N2815Celeron N2820
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
8 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2815) vs VT-x (Celeron N2820). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2815) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2820 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2815 rivals AMD A4-1250; Celeron N2820 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeatureCeleron N2815Celeron N2820
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Netbook