Celeron N2815 vs E-450

Celeron N2815 vs E-450 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N2815

2 / 2

1,068

+0.5%

1,063

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2815 vs E-450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2815 vs E-450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2815

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while E-450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

E-450

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,063 vs 1,068).
❌1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2815 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2815 better than E-450?

Yes. Celeron N2815 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2815 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2815 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2815 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2815 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2815 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2815 vs E-450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2815

The Celeron N2815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,068 points. Launch price was $107.

E-450

The E-450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,063 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2815 and E-450 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron N2815 versus 1.65 GHz on the E-450 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N2815. The Celeron N2815 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the E-450 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2815 scores 1,068 against the E-450's 1,063 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N2815. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron N2815 vs 0 kB on the E-450.

Feature	Celeron N2815	E-450
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz+29%	1.65 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	22 nm-45%	40 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,068	1,063

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E-450 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2815	E-450
Socket	FCBGA1170	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2815) / not specified (E-450). The Celeron N2815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the E-450 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2815 rivals AMD A4-1250.